David Walliams points assertion after being accused of s£xual misconduct

World

By Linda Ikeji
10 November 2026, 4:07 pm

David Walliams has issued an announcement after being accused of s£xual misconduct with ladies, together with younger 15-year-old woman.

The Former Britain’s Got Talent decide has been accused of preying on women and younger ladies for s£xual functions, in response to a three-year joint investigation.

Multiple ladies have accused Walliams of “grooming” them once they have been youngsters.

Williams has now denied abusing his energy as a celeb in relationships with ladies however mentioned he realised he had “behaved thoughtlessly”.

In an announcement to the Guardian and ITV News, the comic mentioned: “Looking back, I realise that at times I behaved thoughtlessly towards other people I had casual s£xual relationships with… I realise I did not always take people’s feelings properly into account. That is something I regret.

“And whilst a power imbalance is inevitable when one party is famous, abusing that power is something else entirely and it is something that I never did…

“I am not a s£xual predator… I have not broken the law… I am devastated that some of the women I met ten to twenty years ago have now expressed hurt or anger towards me.”

Downing Street described the allegations in opposition to David Walliams as “deeply troubling” after he was named in an investigation because the superstar accused of grooming and s£xually inappropriate behaviour in direction of a number of ladies.

Walliams, 55, introduced authorized motion in opposition to Independent Television News (ITN) and Guardian News and Media (GNM), writer of The Guardian, forward of the 2 organisations reporting allegations in opposition to him, together with of s£xual misconduct and potential felony exercise.

Lawyers for the media organisations beforehand informed the High Court in London the allegations concerned Walliams’ alleged “abuse of power and status” to contact younger ladies and attempt to interact in “inappropriate and exploitative s£xual activities”.

Walliams denied the claims and unsuccessfully sought an injunction to forestall these publications due to the danger he would take his personal life, after two earlier su!cide makes an attempt.

The writer was granted anonymity throughout the proceedings, which was lifted after his injunction bid was dismissed and GNM and ITN printed their investigations on Tuesday, November 10, 2026.

During a two-day trial in October, the courtroom was informed by the media organisations’ attorneys that the allegations have been gathered after “a wide-ranging and rigorous investigation” and that there was a “strong” public curiosity in publishing them.

Walliams’ attorneys mentioned that he had initially tried su!cide after receiving letters from ITN and GNM asking for his reply to the allegations, due to “long-term trauma and the fear of trial by media”.